Previous Image
Next Image

info heading

info content


Heads Of Agreement Or Memorandum Of Understanding

Finally, the intention of the parties should be that the provision of the negotiation should be merely an agreement or a negotiation agreement, that it depends on the language chosen by the parties in the negotiating provision and not on a prima facie position that applies to all bargaining provisions. It is certainly possible to design this provision in such a way that it is nothing more than a negotiating agreement. However, it can also be designed so that there is a positive obligation to respect certain parameters and to undertake a number of steps in good faith in the negotiations. Since most aspects of an agreement are non-binding, there are few remedies for non-compliance by either party. They apply only to the legally binding conditions mentioned above. If one party objects to these binding conditions, the other party may seek an injunction, a declaration of appropriate damages, damages or a specified benefit. However, ordinary courts are faced with this approach and continue to re-establish the principle that a bargaining clause is not applicable. Over the past 15 years, there have been a number of cases that have challenged this idea, and the dynamics seemed to be moving in a more „commercial“ direction. For example, Longmore LJ to Petromec ([2005] EWCA Civ 891) and Kirby P of Coal Cliff Collieries Pty Ltd found against Sijehama Pty Ltd ([1991] 24 NWLR 1), that the trading parties clearly had something in mind when they agreed to include a bargaining clause (this would be even more clearly the case if they had tried to explicitly designate it as a legally binding provision).

Longmore LJ noted that deciding that negotiating an agreement „has no legal content … It is for the law to deliberately overcome the legitimate expectations of honest men. In his view, it is difficult for the law to „declare inapplicable a clause in which the parties had voluntarily and explicitly registered.“ Kirby P. was prepared to declare that „provided there was a quid pro quo to the promise“ (for example. B an exclusive plan or break fee), „a promise of good faith will be enforceable on its terms.“

Zurück zur Übersicht!