Previous Image
Next Image

info heading

info content

     

Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (Tpp)

The agreement was designed so that it could finally create a new internal market, something like the EU`s. According to a September 2016 report by the Institute of Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP), „if countries take action to combat climate change, conflicts between trade rules and climate targets will intensify.“ [102]:1 The report also indicates that trade agreements such as the TPP establish broad-based rules for the economy and government policy, which expands trade, often in the extractive sectors, and protects businesses and financial enterprises from future climate stabilization measures. [102] According to the Congressional Research Service, „Tufts` study, as an unconventional framework for the analysis of trade agreements, has attracted particular criticism, while the general equilibrium computable models (CGE) used in Peterson`s study are the standard in commercial analysis.“ [21] Fabio Ghironi, a professor of economics at the University of Washington, describes the models of the World Bank and the Peterson Institute in more favourable terms than Tufts` analysis. [22] Could the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) return from the dead? This is at least a possibility after the publication last Sunday of a carefully worded statement at an APEC ministerial meeting in Vietnam. In the declaration, the agreement of the eleven remaining partners of the TPP, with the exception of… In December 2011, certain patent and copyright enforcement provisions purportedly contained in the US proposal on the agreement were criticized as overly restrictive, beyond the provisions of the Korea-US trade agreement and the anti-counterfeiting trade agreement (ACAC). [111] [112] Harvard economist Robert Z. Lawrence says that the model used by Tufts researchers „is simply not appropriate for credibly predicting the effects of TPP“ and asserts that the model used by Petri and Plummer is superior. [19] Lawrence argues that the model used by Tufts researchers „does not have the granularity that allows it to assess variables such as exports, imports, foreign direct investment and changes in the industrial structure. As a result, his predictions ignore the benefits to TPP economies resulting from increased specialization, economies of scale and better consumer selection. [19] Lawrence also notes that the model used by tufts researchers indicates that the TPP will fall by 5.24% in non-TPP developing countries such as China, India and Indonesia, which is very skeptical of Lawrence: „It is not credible that a trade agreement of this magnitude could lead the rest of the world into recession. [19] Harvard economist Dani Rodrik, a well-known skeptic of globalization, says that Tufts researchers „do a bad job of explaining how their model works, and the details of their simulation are a little dark…

Zurück zur Übersicht!